The male orgasm and the catalyst
Wednesday, July 15th, 2009
From young women I had known that two types of orgasms, the "good" that is the vagina, and the "bad", which is the clitoris. Years passed, passed the sexual revolution, and suddenly we found no orgasms "good" and orgasms "bad", there are orgasms and lack thereof. Accepting that our women, couples, wives, encounters, lovers, girlfriends, affairs, friends when they were saying oh, ayy, more, do not stop, could be wishing I had done the sweaty macho us and we were left alone, it was tough.
But is that deconstruction as it is now called the orgasm does not end here. Suddenly, and at a stroke we say "no vaginal orgasm." When there is always clitoral. Mande? but if I do not know where that is! there is no such thing as vaginal orgasm. They say the feminists, who are most aware of that, and you've done wrong all my life. But if Purita seemed to like it! Might like, but the blows you gave your pelvis in the pelvis of it! or by rubbing almost involuntary, almost remanguillé your dick on her clit. It can not be, could not be. Let those who stirred up the neighborhood shouting that the time was the same as us, giving replicas through the open windows, that bed-wetting, and not sweat, swollen nipples were those from the blows of the bones, as if we were sheep , and not the softness of my body on yours ... Something was wrong.
So I quickly summoned my advisors. And I made a quick reference, as in voting so-called "exit polls consultation," as well, but in "bedside consultation." There were (not together and turns, one is a scientist, not a Superman) Marujita Cuquita and, of course, Purita. So while they catch their breath and lit the cigarette I asked them if that was true, if it could be like we were all, us and them wrong since Freud, and there was only one kind of orgasm, it was the same if it is mounted them with their fingers in the vein of the like or with a dildo in the chichi (let's call things by their name, enough medical terms, clitoris, vagina ... here Pepitilla vein of taste, chichi, clams, almejilla) . And baffled discovery, they did not use dildos, vibrators used, which did not help my pride sietemachos.
But I also said that it was not an orgasm with a vibrator up orgasm with a man inside. That feeling was completely different. Of course that did not invalidate the theory of friction, or shock pubic. It could also happen that the cock in the chichi was the catalyst in a chemical reaction, accelerates, or makes possible, without intervening. He was also a blow to my pride.
So we see that the doctrine was fluctuating, and there was no consensus, I searched the network for different types of orgasm, I learned a lot, I ballooned to view photos and videos, it is a matter whose study equally like doctors, philosophers, priests, and beasts of varying coat.
But (and every rose has its thorn) studies are not peer orgasm, at least until Zapatero to intervene. There are thousands of pages of orgasm in women, porn sites and pages serious, thousands of figures in both (in a few more pictures, in others PowerPoint presentation).
Thousands of studies and websites on women's orgasm, the multi-orgasmic, the squirting, the G spot, but very little of men. The truth is that I have been unable to find references. Photos of guys running if many, but detailed descriptions of the types of orgasm in men (if given), I do not know it.
Of course it's logical, and sorry for the self-reference, but we are in the same situation we were talking about biased statistics in the post of pastors Anabaptists. And the doctors, until relatively recently, were mostly men. And therefore, it was reasonable to consider carefully, circumspectly and scientific interest the female orgasm. It would have been bad apply for a grant for the study of orgasm in graduate students. That sounds really interesting study in the students? because that is what they did. And of those born sludge powders.
Apparently there is very little written about it, so while researchers do not put your hands (and never better employee) to work, I propose, with great spirit of sacrifice in my own flesh develop the scientific study of the male orgasm (when they no pictures) so that when a researcher decides to attack the problem already has a scientific body to begin its study.
So we will start shortly with the taxonomy of the male orgasm. Not that we have two classes, I think we are richer than that.
