A curious statistic (from the forum Priligy)
Friday, September 4th, 2009 For a few years ago when I was alone, I made friends with a masseuse. As you know these pages that follow, I like massage, physical proximity with the masseuse does not make sense to me if no relief after the tension, and makes me a straw.
There is no feeling of "being wrong" to do so, even that is a sexual act, is rather a necessity, such as drinking when thirsty. This will probably surprise the women who read it (if there is any at all), but really, I have no sense of intimacy with the masseuse at the time makes me rub oil cock and hugs me with his hands at the time that MUAC, MUAC, we give two kisses of welcome or farewell. That is why I ask or Burmese, French or other international specialties. I, a straw carpetovetónica, strong and manly at the end of the session.
But all that separates us from the heart of the matter, and what motivates the post.
One, which is puton earless charlatan and talks a blue streak, and since there is very inhibited, as he befriends people. And I made friends with the masseuse. Tell me if I root for this to free massages? the answer is no, our relationship was friendly (I say was because I now live in another city), no advantage outside the massage room, and very professional.
But taking advantage of our friendship, I asked him to take me out of a doubt. I wanted to know if their other clients lasted before running, so little like me. He said he had everything, faster, slower, and customers, much as she insisted, although they stopped as she put it (ie put them hard), not running. And she gave them 15 minutes. That is, the one-hour massage, she spent 30 minutes massage, 15 minutes to stimulation, as she called the straw, and 15 for change of clothes. She, half an hour, began the stimulation, and if at 45 minutes into the massage the guy had not run, or pay a different time, or the street.
So I continued with my question. That other clients that were faster, slower or more ... I needed figures, numbers, statistics ...
So I asked him to join me in a notebook the time it took to run clients. I will say that there are sick minds, but I felt (and feel), as I say, more than curiosity about the subject. You may have seen already with the history of Priligy.
And I said I did not say how long it took me, I treat them as another client, pointing, and then you say how much I resembled my have lasted.
I guess you know, at this stage of the game, how a massage (the so-called "complete, antistress, happy ending"), the masseuse will massage fluttering doing more or less good, then it's up to the masseuse, and after the time, start with the sensitive, more or less supported, more or less localized as the response of the patient's body.
And once a man is able, he masturbates.
I asked him to calculate the age of the client, or the question and that would measure the time between the moment which really began masturbation (ie, no more touching or more sensitive, the pure and simple straw), and moment in which man runs.
And the truth is that the results surprised me ... of course, the sample is not statistically valid or size, as should have a size of about 700 individuals
to represent the company, nor was antibiotic, called, that is, a sample was selected. How to make a street survey on religion, and made population surveys in the street, yes, but in front of the cathedral to the mass exit 12.
Probably the men who go to a massage are more pressed by the common nature of men that one finds on the bus, for example. And how could the evidence is on the bus, had to wait for the victims in the enclosure, where they arrived with a vengeance.
If, however, that statistically the masseuse was good was always the same, as things could do reasonably well, yes, always adapting to the tastes of each client.
But the variation of what you can do with your hands is not much, and she said that's what I wanted was that the man had just rapidillo, if you are not tired the elbow, so look the way they saw The man responded better. Shame not to have her out, because we would ask that we explain the variations.
But I was misled ...
In summary, sample size, 34 individuals, average age 43. That surprised me, she does client selection, and I thought they would be younger.
Speedy Gonzales The sample is two, and last 2 minutes, and are not the youngest, not only that, but are above the average age: 47 and 51 years
After two more than 3 minutes, a 26-year old, which makes sense, but another 60 (ole there!)
Then, the bulk of the curve, there are 11 customers that last 5 minutes and 4 with 7
And then there are October 6 and 8 of 15. No sum 34 because I skipped some intermediate value.
And in the 15 minutes, ages ranging between 28 and 52.
Sure, I'd like now to repeat the test now Priligy.
And, I ask: how does the ranking biblical? (Bible that that the last shall be first. When she asked me what I thought it had gone on, I said three or four minutes, although I could not concentrate because I was thinking a lot in neurons elsewhere. And I said, well no, twice!
So I was quite happy.
Thus shows that everything is relative.









