www.lospecesdecolores.com

For a few years ago when I was alone, I made friends with a masseuse. As you know these pages that follow, I like massage, physical proximity with the masseuse does not make sense to me if no relief after the tension, and makes me a straw.

There is no feeling of "being bad" to do so, even that is a sexual act, is rather a necessity, as the drink when thirsty. This will probably surprise to women who read it (if there is any at all), but really I have no sense of intimacy with the masseuse at the moment I put oil massage cock and hugs me with his hands at the time that MUAC, MUAC, we give two kisses of greeting or farewell. That is why I ask or Burmese, French or other international specialties. I, a straw carpetovetónica, strong and manly at the end of the session.

But all that separates us from the heart of the matter, and what motivates the post.

One, which is puton charlatan and earless, talks up a storm, and as not very inhibited, as he befriends people. And I made friends with the masseuse. Tell me if this made me root for free massages? the answer is no, our relationship was friendly (I say was because I now live in another city) without benefit outside the massage room, and very professional.

But taking advantage of our friendship, I asked him to take me out of doubt. I wanted to know if their other clients lasted, before you run, as little as me. He said he had everything faster, slower, and customers, much as she insisted, although they stopped as I said it (that is, they got hard), not running. And she gave them 15 minutes. That is, in one hour massage, she spent 30 minutes massage, 15 minutes to stimulation, as she called the straw, and 15 for change of clothes. She, in the mean time, the stimulation began, and if the 45 minutes into the massage the guy had not run, or paying another time, or the street.

So I continued with my question. That other customers that were faster, slower or more ... I need numbers, numbers, statistics ...

So I asked him to join me in a notebook the time it took customers to run. I will say that there are sick minds, but I felt (and feel) like I say, more than curiosity in the subject. You may have seen already with the history of Priligy.

And I said I did not say how long it took me, I treat them as another client, pointing, and then he would say how much I resembled my have lasted.

I guess you know, at this stage of the game, how a massage (the so-called "complete, antistress, happy ending"), the masseuse will massage fluttering doing more or less good, then it's up to the masseuse, and after the time, beginning with the sensitive, more or less supported, more or less localized as the response of the patient's body.

And once a man is able, he masturbates.

I asked him to calculate the age of the client, or the question and that would measure the time between the moment which really began masturbation (ie, and no more touching or more sensitive, the pure and simple straw), and at which time the man runs.

And the truth is that the results surprised me ... of course, the sample is not statistically valid or size, as should have a size of about 700 individuals to represent the company, nor was antibiotic, which is called, ie a sample was selected. How to make a street poll on religion, and made to survey the population on the street, yes, but in front of the cathedral out of mass 12.

Probably the men who go to a massage are more pressed by the common nature of men that one finds on the bus, for example. And could not the evidence is on the bus had to wait for the victims in the cabinet, where they arrived with a vengeance.

If, however, that statistically the masseuse was good was always the same, because things could do reasonably well, yes, always adapting to the tastes of each client.

But the variation of what you can do with your hands is not much, and she said that's what I wanted was that man had just rapidillo, if you are not tired elbow, so look the way they saw The man responded better. Shame not to have it at hand because they would ask us to explain the variations.

But I was misled ...

In summary, sample size, 34 individuals, average age 43. That surprised me, she does not select customers, and I thought they would be younger.

The Speedy Gonzales of the sample are two, and last 2 minutes, and are not the youngest, not only that, but they are above the average age: 47 and 51 years

After two more than 3 minutes, a 26-year old, which is logical, but another 60 (ole there!)

Then, the bulk of the curve, there are 11 customers last 5 minutes and 4 7

And then there are October 6 and 8 of 15. No sum 34 because I skipped some intermediate value.

In the 15 minutes, ages ranging between 28 and 52.

Sure, I'd like to repeat the test now now Priligy.

And, I ask: how does the ranking Bible? (Bible that that the last shall be first. When she asked me what I thought it had lasted, I said three to four minutes, but I could not concentrate because I was thinking a lot in neurons elsewhere. And I said, well no, twice!

So I was quite happy.

Thus shows that everything is relative.