www.lospecesdecolores.com

Put here the photo of the instructions, as broad as possible, attention please, which then come the questions

Figure 1 is clear, you put a ring on the condom. Up here, either, although the condom lubricant and massage oil that covered us both hands did not facilitate the task.

Figure 2 and is more complicated, making it eight in the ring. The ring leak, slip ring, when we make the eight this halfway up the condom and not at the bottom, where it belongs ...

Finally we have submitted. I've caught, eight does not resist. But ... but in Figure 3 it is clear that it is she who, while playing the clitoris with my left hand (to recover the environment, lost in the laughter?) Must enter the eight in the (and here, sorry, but no I make the play on words, yes, I know you were expecting, but it will be not), so you must enter the eight in your body with the right hand (see figure 4).

Well, no sir. Except when the woman is deformed and his arms reaching to the knees, is a contortionist Beijing Grand Circus, which is a comprehensive anorexic, gentlemen designers, the fingers of a Spanish woman normally constituted not reach the bottom of your vagina.

She proved access in different positions, sitting, lying down, legs in V (which fed my thoughts singularly, very lewd already), but no, no way. The tip came no more.

I already nervous that the show, while interesting, was extending more than a Wagner opera

So, with traditional Spanish inventiveness, we change the tide. The Spanish where we arrived with the sword, arrived with the tip of the spear so I said go, Monina, stop it, give me the eight legs and work your heart.

Caught eight, my fingers inside her venture, that if protected by a condom. But this was apparently not much of a problem, because there are some sensitive points in the entire area, which make a couple of minutes, the time to locate either the junk she was jumping, and the cervix is ​​very good point, a little neglected by the literature. We loved it.

We recalled bygone other research, so we returned, this time a little more spread out, searching for the elusive G-spot And we found faith. And repeat, more screams, more sighs, a little flood, we had forgotten the condom, which was there, wrinkled and withered as the harp of Becquer.

Here I asked, please, and on behalf of Science, attached to my partner to take off his white coat to show the team under investigation in its working position:

Will note that this sideways, as if to hide in shame, her helplessness.

Well, I retrieved it and excited, and past the laughter, we get down to work, according to Figure 5. To meet the need to figure
a.) the male is well equipped (with about 30 to 32 cm should be enough)
b.) feel like the female condom open with one hand while the other guide to the ingenious mechanism for him to get inside, and not slip out. It is not obvious, and it takes a good light source to check
c.) both are rather athletic type
d.) not escape them laugh, that's good for sex, but bad for the erection.

And back in shape comes from the truth.

And yes, not bad ... and not bad either for her or for me, and I'll explain why.

In a conventional condom, the skin of man is only in contact with the condom. Note the woman's vagina, its folds and movements, but no direct friction. And conversely, the female condom is more similar to normal council, ie the penis moves, there is friction. And not only that, but it is wide as the condom, and it has wrinkles, increases the friction ...

And for her? because some of the same, I said (when he could speak) that was different, but also more natural, because with this she felt the touch of latex on your skin, which generally did not like.

So, my dear friends, we put the female condom

- A 7 on feelings
- A 0 excitation
- A 9 on sex playful and carefree cachondon
and, indeed, 10 orgasms to generation, that provided that (says my enclosed in research, not me) that man knows where to touch, and the condom is as good an excuse as any for that play well and consciousness with the fingers.

Finally, do not know if it's a big compliment ...

good, and obviously if you have any experience with the pileup of yore and want to share, you are welcome.

From young women I had known that two types of orgasms, the "good" that is the vagina, and the "bad", which is the clitoris. Years passed, passed the sexual revolution, and suddenly we found no orgasms "good" and orgasms "bad", there are orgasms and lack thereof. Accepting that our women, couples, wives, encounters, lovers, girlfriends, affairs, friends when they were saying oh, ayy, more, do not stop, could be wishing I had done the sweaty macho us and we were left alone, it was tough.

But is that deconstruction as it is now called the orgasm does not end here. Suddenly, and at a stroke we say "no vaginal orgasm." When there is always clitoral. Mande? but if I do not know where that is! there is no such thing as vaginal orgasm. They say the feminists, who are most aware of that, and you've done wrong all my life. But if Purita seemed to like it! Might like, but the blows you gave your pelvis in the pelvis of it! or by rubbing almost involuntary, almost remanguillé your dick on her clit. It can not be, could not be. Let those who stirred up the neighborhood shouting that the time was the same as us, giving replicas through the open windows, that bed-wetting, and not sweat, swollen nipples were those from the blows of the bones, as if we were sheep , and not the softness of my body on yours ... Something was wrong.

So I quickly summoned my advisors. And I made a quick reference, as in voting so-called "exit polls consultation," as well, but in "bedside consultation." There were (not together and turns, one is a scientist, not a Superman) Marujita Cuquita and, of course, Purita. So while they catch their breath and lit the cigarette I asked them if that was true, if it could be like we were all, us and them wrong since Freud, and there was only one kind of orgasm, it was the same if it is mounted them with their fingers in the vein of the like or with a dildo in the chichi (let's call things by their name, enough medical terms, clitoris, vagina ... here Pepitilla vein of taste, chichi, clams, almejilla) . And baffled discovery, they did not use dildos, vibrators used, which did not help my pride sietemachos.

But I also said that it was not an orgasm with a vibrator up orgasm with a man inside. That feeling was completely different. Of course that did not invalidate the theory of friction, or shock pubic. It could also happen that the cock in the chichi was the catalyst in a chemical reaction, accelerates, or makes possible, without intervening. He was also a blow to my pride.

So we see that the doctrine was fluctuating, and there was no consensus, I searched the network for different types of orgasm, I learned a lot, I ballooned to view photos and videos, it is a matter whose study equally like doctors, philosophers, priests, and beasts of varying coat.

But (and every rose has its thorn) studies are not peer orgasm, at least until Zapatero to intervene. There are thousands of pages of orgasm in women, porn sites and pages serious, thousands of figures in both (in a few more pictures, in others PowerPoint presentation).

Thousands of studies and websites on women's orgasm, the multi-orgasmic, the squirting, the G spot, but very little of men. The truth is that I have been unable to find references. Photos of guys running if many, but detailed descriptions of the types of orgasm in men (if given), I do not know it.

Of course it's logical, and sorry for the self-reference, but we are in the same situation we were talking about biased statistics in the post of pastors Anabaptists. And the doctors, until relatively recently, were mostly men. And therefore, it was reasonable to consider carefully, circumspectly and scientific interest the female orgasm. It would have been bad apply for a grant for the study of orgasm in graduate students. That sounds really interesting study in the students? because that is what they did. And of those born sludge powders.

Apparently there is very little written about it, so while researchers do not put your hands (and never better employee) to work, I propose, with great spirit of sacrifice in my own flesh develop the scientific study of the male orgasm (when they no pictures) so that when a researcher decides to attack the problem already has a scientific body to begin its study.

So we will start shortly with the taxonomy of the male orgasm. Not that we have two classes, I think we are richer than that.